Does the U.S. Congress Need a Timeout?
Or, how members of Congress are like academics who are like... everyone else.
Today’s newsletter begins with a simple, undisputable premise: members of the United States Congress love, love to make fun of folks they think are not working hard enough.
Consider my primary place of employment: the ivory tower. For member of Congress, academia is just a place where college students are pampered to death. Representative Greg Murphy (R, North Carolina) recently stated, “There is a theme in some circles of higher education to pamper students rather than prepare them for the real world. Some colleges and universities have turned into coddle farms with safe spaces and trigger alerts.” Similarly, a few years ago Representative Dan Crenshaw (R, Texas) asserted, “The University is a place for students to grapple with new ideas and opinions, not be coddled.” Members of Congress do not feel any warmer about college professors and administrators.1 They believe anyone associated with an institution of higher education is a snowflake.
To be fair, however, it would appear that some members of Congress have that snowflake feeling about, well, everyone:
The above video was not the only incident on Tuesday involving members of Congress behaving badly. One CNN anchor asked out loud, “What the hell is going on?! What is this?” Furthermore, several of the members of Congress behaving badly doubled down on their behavior in follow-up interviews.
In was in this context that I read with great interest Tuesday’s NBC News story about this less-than-sterling congressional behavior — and one senior Senator’s diagnosis of the problem:
Tensions erupted on Capitol Hill on Tuesday after a fistfight nearly broke out in a Senate hearing and a Republican congressman accused former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy of assaulting him….
A spokesman for Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., seemed to react to both incidents on X. "Today is another example of why Congress shouldn’t be in session for 5 weeks straight. Weird things happen."
McConnell told reporters he hadn't heard about the incidents but said it is "very difficult to control the behavior of everybody who’s in the building. I don’t view that as my responsibility. That’s something that the Capitol Police have to deal with.” (emphases added)
Oh, wow. the members of Congress have been at work in the Capitol for five whole weeks?! My God, five straight weeks of work seems to be getting to them. Imagine having to study or teach for ten straight weeks — or even, God forbid, fourteen straight weeks!!
Now when I snarked about this on BlueSky, some folks pointed out, correctly, that members of Congress actually work pretty hard. They have to constantly dial for dollars in order to raise campaign contributions. They have to deal on a regular basis with colleagues who believe themselves to be either the world’s greatest debater or the future President of the United States. Plus, anyone familiar with Richard Fenno’s Home Style knows that members of Congress should be doing a lot of constituency work when they are in their home districts.
This is all true! Of course, this also describes the activities of any university administrator or professor. Constantly needing to raise money? Check. Taking care of stakeholders outside the classroom? Also check. Having obnoxious colleagues who believe themselves to be the smartest people in the room? Check, double-check, checkmate.
As much as I’d like to snark some more about congressional hypocrisy — and I do, I really, really do — what I actually think is going on in both Congress and the academy runs a bit deeper. Those institutions, like the rest of the country, remains traumatized.
My podcasting partner-in-crime Ana Marie Cox penned a New Republic cover story a few months ago about how the myriad shocks that have buffeted the United States over the past decade has left the entire country — including universities, including Congress — in a state of collective trauma. See if her description sounds familiar:
You do not have to expand the definition of a traumatic event into the grayer areas of everyday slights and microaggressions to find millions and millions of Americans who have met with increasing levels of trauma since the Trump era began and the pandemic twisted our culture even more tightly into dysfunction….
Collective trauma, [Kai Erikson] wrote, means “a blow to the basic tissues of social life that damages the bonds attaching people together and impairs the prevailing sense of communality.” Collective trauma happens in slow motion, “A form of shock all the same…. ‘I’ continue to exist, though damaged and maybe even permanently changed. ‘You’ continue to exist, though distant and hard to relate to. But ‘we’ no longer exist as a connected pair or as linked cells in a larger communal body.”
In other words, the defining characteristic of collective trauma—and what makes it almost impossible to self-diagnose—is that people who have been through it no longer believe in the integrity of their community. How does anyone see themselves as a traumatized collective if no one feels that they belong?
Congress, more than most institutions, bears significant responsibility for its dysfunction and disintegration. That does not mean that their dysfunction and disintegration are not real.
As Cox warned in TNR, “Our biggest problem is the people who need help and refuse to admit it.” Which means that in a weird way, Mitch McConnell is correct. Congress is a traumatized institution that is doing little to heal itself. Spending time back at home would probably be best for everyone concerned.
I just wish that they realized that they too are snowflakes. They are behaving badly and in partial denial about the cause of it. And every criticism they have levied against higher education applies with even greater force to their own institution.
Some members of Congress are so scathing in their criticism of young people that they feel compelled to go after their own volunteers.
I am going to respond to a comment in reference to my comment below. I have no idea how it could be inferred I was a democrat and was not concerned about the fiscal mess we are in. I think, in fact, that was precisely my point of talking about Rome burning. I have been an independent since I could vote in the late 1970s, have been intensely policy-focused and analytically driven and have voted for both democrats and republicans over the years. I have always emphasized who I thought could actually govern, build solid teams of build to make informed decisions and come up with pragmatic solutions on a bipartisan basis that solve some of the dire circumstances we are facing. Simply put, please do not make assumptions about me, my perspectives, and my values. I am despairing right now and, frankly, don;t see how this all ends.
Just an observation about work schedules for Congress: I am not sure what the definition of "work" is here, and I am sure some representatives and senators work hard by any criteria used. However, my husband and just last week discussed how Congress always seems to be adjourning and disappearing for days while Rome has been burning, so to speak. Let's take the House of Representatives, for example. (I could do a similar analysis for the Senate but the House is my focus for obvious reasons, I think.) In October, it was only 8 days "in session," and the rest were called "district work periods." And there was a federal holiday in October, and of course, we all know the spectacle we witnessed where most of the business was taken up with trying to elect a House Speaker, and of course, the Joe Biden impeachment inquiry among other wonderful, legislative initiatives benefiting the country. Then,, in November, which we are currently in, it was supposed to be in session 8 days through November 16th, but only managed 6 1/2 since the session was gaveled closed on Wednesday afternoon where a procedural vote failed, rendering any votes going forward impossible. (This was the period that all of the fighting and verbal abuse was going on!) So, everyone went home. And, do remember there was another federal holiday on November 10th, so off the representatives go home! Next week the session is supposed to start on Tuesday (not Monday) after a long holiday weekend, and the rest of the week days in the month were and are deemed "district work periods." Somehow, this does not seem like 5 straight weeks of work! And, finally, there are only 21 days of legislative sessions between now and January 19th, the next deadline for a government shutdown for at least some of the government functions! One final comment: somehow I have been reading about Mike Johnson being so nice and accommodating to ensure that the government didn't shut down prior to the holidays. (Just think how happy that would have made Congressional members to go home to, particularly those flying!) My prediction: just wait until you see the funding bills he comes up with! We ain't seen nothing yet! Somehow, I would not count this as a heavy work schedule and certainly not a productive one which focuses on what they are all there for: legislating effective solutions to a variety of the complex issues facing this country. (I hope you get the sarcasm here!)