Drezner’s World

Share this post

Drezner's World Is Going on a Fact-Finding Trip

danieldrezner.substack.com

Drezner's World Is Going on a Fact-Finding Trip

The newsletter will be intermittent for the next two weeks

Daniel W. Drezner
May 10, 2023
10
3
Share
flat lay photography of camera, book, and bag
Photo by Annie Spratt on Unsplash

Dear readers,

The hard-working staff here at Drezner’s World is headed overseas for the next ten days or so. As one of the co-directors for the Fletcher School’s Russia and Eurasia Program, I am occasionally obligated to partake in activities related to that position. Traveling to Russia now is right out, so instead I’ll be going to Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan to see how those countries are coping with Russian revanchism, an influx of Russian migrants, and a desire to preserve policy autonomy in a… let’s say “precarious” corner of the world.

This means two very long trips and some uncertain internet access while there. So I cannot promise that there will be newsletters over the next ten days. I will try, however, to opine while abroad. If nothing else, I’m gonna have to weigh in on The Diplomat.

Drezner’s World is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

In the meanwhile, and if you haven’t already, check out my latest for Politico on the politics of national security leaks. It came about because of Marjorie Taylor Greene’s initial defense of Jack Teixeira as a whistleblower and whether that meant that all national security leaks would always be viewed through a partisan lens. I’m someone who thinks political polarization has had pernicious effects on the American body politic, and Greene’s reaction would be Exhibit A if I was filing that brief.

In the end, however, I concluded that partisanship goes only so far in explaining the myriad political reactions to the Edward Snowdens and Jack Teixeiras of the world:

Even in today’s polarized atmosphere, partisanship alone does not explain the reaction to every leak. National security is one area where the ideological extremes of both parties often meet, with the far-left and far-right valorizing leakers because they view them as victims of a system they do not trust. A further complication is that by their very nature, whistleblowers are often contrarian, cantankerous and self-righteous — and that automatically makes them polarizing figures.

Thank you for reading Drezner’s World. This post is public so feel free to share it.

Share

Read the whole thing — and you’ll be hearing opinions from me on other topics as soon as I form them and have the time to write them out!

DWD

Leave a comment

10
3
Share
3 Comments
Michael Wild
May 10

Pick up lots of interesting facts Professor!

Expand full comment
Reply
Peter Gumley
May 10

Julian Assange's plight should be considered along with Snowden and Teixeira. After all he published redacted information supplied by Manning who is now free. The notion that the US DoJ is pursuing and demanding extradition of a foreign national through a foreign court with unfounded allegations of espionage in legislation drafted in 1917 and rarely used since bears no credulity other than demonstrating that free speech and the right to practice responsible journalism is now under threat world wide.

Expand full comment
Reply
1 more comment…
Top
New
Community

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2023 Daniel W. Drezner
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start WritingGet the app
Substack is the home for great writing