Great to see the NY Times belatedly publish a refutation of the idea that China is poised to invade Taiwan. Still, Glaser understates the case. Such an invasion would be massively more difficult than the D-Day landings, even if there had been no tech advance since 1944. But with satellites and anti-ship missiles, it's impossible and beco…
Great to see the NY Times belatedly publish a refutation of the idea that China is poised to invade Taiwan. Still, Glaser understates the case. Such an invasion would be massively more difficult than the D-Day landings, even if there had been no tech advance since 1944. But with satellites and anti-ship missiles, it's impossible and becoming more so every day (if something impossible can become more impossible). I've been banging this drum for years https://www.channelnewsasia.com/commentary/south-china-sea-trade-resource-nuclear-war-us-australia-taiwan-2398241
Great to see the NY Times belatedly publish a refutation of the idea that China is poised to invade Taiwan. Still, Glaser understates the case. Such an invasion would be massively more difficult than the D-Day landings, even if there had been no tech advance since 1944. But with satellites and anti-ship missiles, it's impossible and becoming more so every day (if something impossible can become more impossible). I've been banging this drum for years https://www.channelnewsasia.com/commentary/south-china-sea-trade-resource-nuclear-war-us-australia-taiwan-2398241